| Panel | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Academic Language
Academic language, or the language of schooling, includes both general academic words and discipline specific academic words necessary to succeed in the lesson task (Nagy & Townsend, 2012). Zweirs (2008) defines academic language as "the set of words, grammar, and organizational strategies used to describe complex ideas, higher order thinking processes, and abstract concepts" (p. 20). Academic Language is the means by which an educator knows if a student can communicate to met the goals or objectives for the lesson.
It is important for educators to keep in mind that academic language is both receptive (seen/heard) and productive (spoken/read). Receptive and productive descriptions of language are also called language modalities. The acronym SWRL ("swirl") helps in remembering to consider each of the language modalities needed for learner success; SWRL stands for Speaking, Writing, Reading and Listening. It is beneficial for candidates to consider all language modalities when thinking about how learners will be asked to meet the lesson's content goal or objective (Goldenberg, 2013; Vogt, Echevarria, & Short, 2010). Building candidate awareness of academic language is important for the support and success of all learners, but is of crucial importance for multilingual learners.
Now, we will take a look at how we communicate and talk about academic language in instructional planning by further defining academic language and how to identify it in relationship to your lesson's learning goal and subject specific content.
Defining Academic Language
In the UNW School of Education Lesson Plan document, you will find prompts asking you to:
Identify the following language demands used to accomplish the objective(s) of the lesson:
Function:
Form:
Syntax:
Discourse:
Let's take a closer look at what each of those prompts are asking you to identify to help clarify what academic language is needed for your learners to be able to accomplish their lesson objective(s). Then we can consider what additional scaffolds and supports are needed to support academic language success for all learners as well as multilingual learners with differing specific language proficiencies.
Language Demands
There are several concepts involving language that students are expected to understand and make use of in the lesson. These are demands of the student that are necessary for understanding content, participating in the lesson you will be teaching, and meeting the lesson objective. Language demands include function, form, syntax and discourse.
Here is a visual to help with
...
defining the Types of Academic Language, where:
...
a) function = reason or purpose for communication,
b) form = word/phrase vocabulary,
c) syntax = sentence level, and
d) discourse = linguistic complexity (type, context, and amount):
Students need explicit instruction in academic language in each of these areas in each discipline to understand content and express their understanding.
Function
To learn and express understanding of content, students need to be taught the purpose or function of the language for the particular lesson task. Functions of language refer to what the language is used to perform. Often the function is a part of the lesson objective. The function most often indicates the purpose of the cognitive, communicative, and/or physical action.
When you think of ‘function’, think about the verb as often the function is expressed as a verb such as critique, examine, retell argue, and categorize. Other examples of function include the following, along with their associated or related functions (Benegas & Stopelstad, 2020); Academic language function words in bold are used by the EdTPA teacher assessment system (www.edtpa.com):
...
Locate-- define, seek information, count, identify, indicate, match, name, point, recall, recite, repeat, reproduce, state, select, recall.
...
Academic Language: A Helpful Metaphor
"Bricks, Mortar, and Buildings" is a nine-minute video that presents a metaphor for academic language by the same title (Benegas & Stolpestad, 2019). This metaphor will also be used to assist in identifying the academic language needs of your instructional sequence and learning goals. Determining the academic language demands related to the lesson objective is a very important step in planning for the success for all learners.
Additionally, "Building with Bricks and Mortar" can be a strategy used to clearly orientate students to the academic language needed for success in meeting the instructional learning objective. The linked "Building with Bricks and Mortor" (7 min) on-line instructional video demonstrates how this same metaphor could be adapted for use in multiple contexts to identify and communicate the needed academic language for the instructional goal in a student-friendly way.
Function = Purpose for Communication
To learn and express understanding of content, students need to be taught the purpose or function of the language for the particular lesson task. Functions of language refer to what the language is used to perform. Often the function is a part of the lesson objective. The function most often indicates the purpose of the cognitive, communicative, and/or physical action. A function is often the verb found in the objective statement; it is ONE WORD.
When you think of ‘function’, think about the verb as often the function is expressed as a verb such as critique, examine, retell argue, and categorize. Other examples of function include the following, along with their associated or related functions (Benegas & Stopelstad, 2020); Academic language function words in bold are used by the EdTPA teacher assessment system (www.edtpa.com):
Locate-- define, seek information, count, identify, indicate, match, name, point, recall, recite, repeat, reproduce, state, select, recall.
- Order—Categorize, organize, develop, discover, complete, process, outline, retell, order
- Describe— inform, explain, identify, report, retell, recount, reorder, represent, depict, paraphrase, summarize, conclude, prepare, convert, translate, generalize, extrapolate, narrate.
- Classify— arrange, organize, categorize, construct, create, generate, summarize, arrange, group
- Compare/Contrast— Describe (similarities and differences), distinguish, identify, recognize, separate, differentiate.
- Analyze— calculate, interpret, classify, categorize, predict, deduce, differentiate, examine, discriminate, distinguish, group, illustrate, infer, order, recognize, relate, transform
- Synthesize— Arrange, categorize, combine, compile, compose, construct, create, deduce, explain, formulate, generalize, generate, integrate, modify, organize, prepare, plan, produce, propose, rearrange, reconstruct, relate, reorganize, revise, solve, summarize.
- Justify— argue, persuade, discriminate, prove, deduce, document, support, question, validate, verify, debate, construct, persuade
- Infer-- predict, hypothesize, extrapolate, restate, summarize, reconstruct, synthesize, derive, deduce, explain, create, construct
- Evaluate- argue, appraise, assess, compare, conclude, consider, contrast, criticize, critique, decide, describe, determine, discriminate, grade, judge, justify, recommend, validate, verify, test, support, rate, rank, measure, interpret, relate, identify, explain, indicate, confirm.
Form= Bricks 
Students also need to be taught and need to demonstrate use of forms of language. Forms are new words, (including content-specific vocabulary). When you think of form, think about words used to convey the message, words used to build or convey the concept, multiple meaning words, or words that will be important to understand the overall meaning of the text. You will need to identify these for (or with) students at the beginning, and throughout the lesson. Also, provide opportunities for students to use this vocabulary during the lesson to demonstrate their understanding of the vocabulary. Though content area vocabulary lists are often long, identifying academic language forms informs instructional goals by narrowing down to 1-3 words, selected because of their great impact on communication and learning.
Syntax = Mortar 
Syntax refers to structure of words, phrases and sentences. When you think about syntax, think about sentence structure and length, transitions and connectives such as ‘because’ and ‘however’. Syntax also include a myriad of grammatical constructs and elements, including but not limited to verb tenses, passive voice, pronoun references, order of words in sentences, conventions of print, and musical, mathematical, and scientific notations. Consider how syntax may affect students’ understanding and communication of important content and concepts through analyzing how students will SWRL throughout your intended instructional sequence.
Discourse
Discourse is the broadest of the four language demands. Discourse refers to how we talk in our specific disciplines. To engage in the discourse of the discipline, students need to know the terminology and way of speaking in the discipline in order to be successful. We also use a different discourse when we speak in reading class than we do in social studies or music class. Did you know that nonverbal gestures are even a part of discourse-specific language? Discourse describes a more holistic view of the academic language for communication that is required, or the largest conceptual segments of language.
When trying to define the needed holistic language to complete an academic task, it is helpful to think about the text types and genre labels given to different types of discourses. There are many ways to classify discourse. There is both written and spoken discourse. There is also monologic (produced by one speaker or writer), dialogic (produced by two speakers or writers), and multi-party (with three or more contributors). The types of discourse used can be classified according to communicative purpose, style, intended audience and formality within the given text or genre. Taken together, these classifications acknowledge that different language is typically used for a poem, a science lab report, an organized tutorial video, a persuasive essay, an orchestral piece, an artist's biography, or a small group discussion. Preparing students to recognize and engage in appropriate use of discourse will help them be successful in the lesson.
Relative to further classifying the formality of discourse students will need which is typical of academic language, we must also consider "register" and helping students "switch registers" to meet the language goals. Register is the linguistic term meaning that we use different discourse patterns when we speak or write to different groups or contexts. For example, we speak differently when talking casually with friends than we do when giving a formal presentation. We also speak differently when we summarize than when we debate. We can explicitly teach students what discourse type, genre, or register is needed to communicate in the given context.
Identifying Academic Language Demands
Prior to creating the academic language goals, it's important to take an inventory of the language demands of the lesson. Your UNW lesson plan form can guide you through thinking about the function, forms, syntax, and discourse your students will use or, in other words, the SWRL language domains needed relative to your particular context and learning goal.
Academic language must be planned for and taught during the lesson. This includes having students demonstrate use of the academic language within the lesson sequence, with opportunities for evaluation and feedback. Function, form, syntax, and discourse work together to achieve communication for the purposes of meeting the content learning objective.
...
intended instructional sequence.
Discourse = Buildings
Discourse is the broadest of the four language demands. Discourse refers to how we talk in our specific disciplines. To engage in the discourse of the discipline, students need to know the terminology and way of speaking in the discipline in order to be successful. We also use a different discourse when we speak in reading class than we do in social studies or music class. Did you know that nonverbal gestures are even a part of discourse-specific language? Discourse describes a more holistic view of the academic language for communication that is required, or the largest conceptual segments of language.
When trying to define the needed holistic language to complete an academic task, it is helpful to think about the text types and genre labels given to different types of discourses. There are many ways to classify discourse. There is both written and spoken discourse. There is also monologic (produced by one speaker or writer), dialogic (produced by two speakers or writers), and multi-party (with three or more contributors). The types of discourse used can be classified according to communicative purpose, style, intended audience and formality within the given text or genre. Taken together, these classifications acknowledge that different language is typically used for a poem, a science lab report, an organized tutorial video, a persuasive essay, an orchestral piece, an artist's biography, or a small group discussion. Preparing students to recognize and engage in appropriate use of discourse will help them be successful in the lesson.
Relative to further classifying the formality of discourse students will need which is typical of academic language, we must also consider "register" and helping students "switch registers" to meet the language goals. Register is the linguistic term meaning that we use different discourse patterns when we speak or write to different groups or contexts. For example, we speak differently when talking casually with friends than we do when giving a formal presentation. We also speak differently when we summarize than when we debate. We can explicitly teach students what discourse type, genre, or register is needed to communicate in the given context.
Identifying Academic Language Demands
Prior to creating the academic language goals, it's important to take an inventory of the language demands of the lesson. Your UNW lesson plan form can guide you through thinking about the function, forms, syntax, and discourse your students will use or, in other words, the SWRL language domains needed relative to your particular context and learning goal.
Academic language must be planned for and taught during the lesson. This includes having students demonstrate use of the academic language within the lesson sequence, with opportunities for evaluation and feedback. Function, form, syntax, and discourse work together to achieve communication for the purposes of meeting the content learning objective.
Example 1: VisualExplanation of Process for Identifying Academic Language Based on Central Focus and Alignment:
- Develop a Clear Objective: State content K-12 Standards in each discipline area are very helpful for clarifying the lesson's Central Focus. That said, it is not necessary to start with a state standard in mind when writing your objective, but it is wise to locate which of the content standards for this specific grade level and content area align with your intended objective and lesson goals before attempting to analyze the academic language needed for success. Here, you can see that this example uses the state Science standards for elementary students in grade 4. Reflect on how the state standards (4.1.2.2 and 4.2.2.2) align with the stated learning goal, objective, and student-friendly "I can..." statement.
- Identify a Language Focus: Consider how learners will demonstrate success in meeting the lesson objective. Use the action verb in the SWBAT statement for the "function" prompt (ONE WORD), and then consider what a student meeting that function would understand (receptive modalities: Listening, Reading) or produce (productive modalities: Speaking, Writing). In this example, EXPLAIN is the action verb in the objective and the function word in the academic language. To EXPLAIN correctly and meet this assignment objective, a student would need to use the identified forms, syntax, and discourse identified below:
- Extension: What Scaffolds are Needed? After an analysis of what learners "can do" at each proficiency level, then, leads to the identification of what scaffolds and supports are needed to differentiate for the learners with multilingual and multicultural considerations, identified above in response to prompt 4a) in the Context for Learning. (See SOE Lesson Plan Handbook section for further details about prompts 4a and 4b, linked for your convenience here). Here is an example of scaffolds and supports that would help to support multilingual learners in meeting this objective based on the identified Academic Language above:
Example 2: Narrative Explanation of Process for Identifying Academic Language Based on Central Focus and Alignment:
When identifying the academic language demands and supports related to an objective, a teacher may think reflectively through many inter-related aspects of lesson planning. In the box below is an example of this type reflective thinking. Note- this is in narrated form, NOT what you would write or script out within your lesson plan document. There are example responses to the lesson plan form prompts available in 6.5 Appendix E - Identifying Academic Language
...
.
"Compare and Contrast" Academic Language: Thinking It Through
This academic language example is related to the lesson objective, “All students will be able to compare and contrast concepts of then and now (including past, present, and future) by matching pictures of objects from the past to their current counterparts, getting at least 5 out of 6 pairs correct.” The function of the language needed is to compare and contrast. The academic language the students will need to know to be successful in this lesson includes function the direction or activity words: “sort” and “pair up/match”. Students will be using these words when we are working with the past/present matching cards. These words may not be new for all students in the class but I will be sure to show all students an example of what I am asking them to do to make sure they understand. I will do this by doing an example together, then asking a volunteer pair to come up and illustrate how to match a pair together. I am expecting that not all objects from different eras will be familiar to all students. We will be talking about objects shown in the book and discussed together that the students may not know, including “records”, “cassette tapes”, and “CDs”. Additional language demands include understanding forms related to this lesson in connection with past and present. Key terms include “past”, “present”, “future”, and “then” and “now”, along with a variety of adverbial forms and phrases related to time. Some students may produce adverbs of time such as "last century", "last year", "X years ago", and "today." I think some students may use these adverbial time words (forms) that show when something happened out of order. This may relate to the semantic meaning or use of the words. Usually, these words work well at the end of the sentence, as in "These cassettes were used in the past". Most students in my class know how to use correct verb tenses, though "were from/were used" and "are from/are used" verb phrases (syntax) can be reviewed for those students who need it. I will display text from our social studies book on the document camera and, together as a class, we will examine the text to look for the words past, present, future, then, and now. We will talk about the syntax that may cause confusion or misunderstanding for students. For example, I think the students may misunderstand what the author is referring to when he writes, “Then and Now” as a heading though it is a common title for this type of comparative activity. Students may not know what or when “then” refers to and we will look for context clues to show us the specific timeframe.If needed, I will use baby and childhood pictures of me representing change over time to show them additional visuals representing “past” and “present”. They do love seeing photos of me when I was young! It is a great way to "hook" them in. I will use their attention to then read very lengthy sentences together (chorus reading) and create a bulleted list of important concepts in these sentences to model for students how to do close reading to gain the most information by asking volunteers for observations. Some students might otherwise struggle with the long sentences, skim or skip information and as a result miss some important information that is necessary to understanding the entire text. Also, in displaying the text, I will talk about how the author structured the text. It models a compare/contrast text structure related to both syntax and discourse. I will point this out to students to see why the author is using visuals within the text and how the charts relate to the compare/contrast text structure. I will highlight key adverbial time forms (words) and syntax (sentences). We will convert our bulleted list to a T-chart to organize our "then and now" information. This T-chart graphic organizer/poster, also known as an anchor chart, will then later be added to with sentence frames that students can use to demonstrate their ability to perform the compare/contrast function. To support the students in expressing their understanding of the lesson objective by following directions, I will use the Document Camera to model what it means to “sort” and “pair-up” as I use the above listed forms related to the academic language demands to meet the objective. I will ask students for an example of "sort or match", and perhaps someone will demonstrate how to sort crayons and pair up similar crayons or other similar example based on previous learning experience. We will then proceed to the social studies activity of sorting and pairing up with the "then and now" featured objects. To further support my students' semantic word understanding and usage, I will help students make connections between “past”, “present”, and “future” to the more familiar words “yesterday”, “today”, and “tomorrow” that we use every day during our Morning Meeting/Calendar routines. We will brainstorm together a list of related adverbial time words or phrases, including "last year", "years ago", "in the present", etc. which people use to talk about past/present/future. Making connections to their prior knowledge in this way will help them understand the meanings of our new academic vocabulary as well as model the correct placement in a sentence (syntax). Students will have two specific opportunities to express their understanding of this content and use the academic language associated with it: 1) They will engage in a sorting and pairing-up activity with a partner in which they will use the words, “sort”, “pair-up”, “past”, “present”, and “future” with their partners. Students pairs will also be asked to explain their sorts by using the sentence frame, “I sorted in this way to compare and contrast. This shows the past because___________________. This shows the______________________ because_________________.” and 2) Presenting their sort to another pair, using the following past and present frame as needed, with the expectation that all students will be able to explain their findings in complete sentences, such as: a) "__________________ (were from/were used) (past adverb of time) but now, ________________ (are from/are used)." These frames would be presented as models (i.e. "Cassettes were used many years ago but now most people use a web streaming service like Spotify.") with any correct sentences brainstormed by students which correctly use the frame (both form and syntax) being added to the anchor chart as an example. (past syntax/discourse examples for EdTPA). |
...
With the visual model to help organize relevant information, the above frames would notably extend or enhance the syntax of learners who need to orally report their findings to a peer with appropriate transition words based on subject-specific content. An appropriate challenge might be to see if students could use all three or perhaps create their own comparison or contrast statement based on their analysis. Additionally, you can refer to the example in the box above for a more holistic example of how the selected supports of academic language development could be inter-related within the learning context and goals.
More language support tools and examples specific steps to differentiating for your multilingual learners are located within this handbook in in 6.5 Appendix E - Identifying Academic Language Objective. Included in Appendix E are 6.5a Academic Language: How to Support Multilingual Learners are further instructions on how to understand the language proficiency levels of your multilingual learners and use that information to inform your selection of instructional supports to meet the needs of each individual. Included in 6.5b Academic Language: WIDA Resources for Teaching Multilingual Learners are tools to inform your understanding of what multilingual learners "can do" at each specific language proficiency level.
A Summary of How to Determine Academic Language Objectives:
...